California man Rodney Meadows turned a $1,000 lottery win into $10 million, but he’sn’t the only real multimillion-dollar lucky gambler this holiday season.
A California man had been especially thankful on the Thanksgiving vacation after he won the California scratcher lottery not once but twice in a day, albeit at extremely different valuations.
On Monday, November 23, just three days before Americans gathered around tables to count their blessings, Rodney Meadows walked into a Modesto, California, convenience shop and purchased a few $30 scratcher tickets.
After won hit for $1,000, he allow it to ride by purchasing three more tickets.
One of those three paid down to the tune of $10,000,000.
One in Three Million Chance
‘I could not think it,’ Meadows told KCRA that is local news. ‘I had to ask the clerk during the shop and he stated, ‘You better check it again.”
Though it’s rather common for scratch-off gamblers to shop for additional tickets after winning a nominal value, it’s extremely rare for someone to strike twice with prizes over $1,000.
In reality, it’s been 13 years since anyone has one two jackpots in a 24-hour timespan worth more than Meadows’ take.
The manager of the convenience shop said it ‘couldn’t have happened up to a nicer man,’ and which he felt Meadows was eventually planning to win. ‘He plays compulsively everyday,’ Fast Mart Manager Lakhvir Singh said.
According to lottery spokesman Greg Parashak, Meadows had a one in three million chance of winning the $10 million scratcher jackpot. The Fast Mart location will receive $50,000 for the great fortune of selling the ticket that is winning.
NetEnt Strikes Too
Fortunes are apparently abound this festive season, as NetEnt awarded its largest mobile slot jackpot in business history this week to a Swedish player gambling on the ComeOn Casino.
Alexander, a 30-year-old from Stockholm who’s withholding his last name, became a multi-millionaire immediately when a €1.50 ($1.63) bet turned into €8.6 million ($9.3 million).
‘we was totally speechless and mightn’t think what ended up being happening,’ Alexander said after the win. ‘I’ll make certain my mortgage is paid and treat myself for some exciting holidays… It will probably be difficult to avoid buying a brand new car!’
NetEnt Chief of Product Officer Simon Hammon said of the headlines, ‘It’s fantastic to break another record with this jackpot won via mobile. Our games have paid out over €13 million in jackpots in only over per week, the perfect early Christmas present.’
Caesars Welcomes NetEnt
For those reading into the Garden State and looking to try their luck like Alexander, Caesars Interactive Entertainment (CIE) will soon offer NetEnt products through the CaesarsCasino.com website.
After obtaining a waiver that is transactional hawaii’s Division of Gaming Enforcement, NetEnt signed a content distribution agreement with Caesars to create its software platform to New Jersey.
‘We are very excited and proud to … launch our first portfolio offering with Caesars Interactive Entertainment,’ NetEnt Managing Director Bjorn Krantz stated in a press release. ‘we look forward to this partnership and am confident that our innovative and thrilling portfolio of best-in-class games is going to be well received by CIE and its players.’
A little extra holiday investing money would certainly be welcomed by many, even when it isn’t multimillions as experienced by the world’s recent lucky champions.
RAWA Home Hearing to Occur Then Wednesday
‘Did I leave the oven on?’ Jason Chaffetz ponders the subtle nuances of online gambling and its wider social and economic implications. (Image: www.politico.com)
The Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) will receive a hearing before the home on December 9, it emerged this week.
The hearing, entitled ‘A Casino in Every Smartphone: Law Enforcement Implications,’ will be chaired, naturally, by Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who introduced RAWA to the House back in February.
The bill itself would effectively ban all forms of on the web gambling for a level that is federal apart from horseracing and, for the time-being at least, daily dream activities.
Its prohibitory scope would extend to the online lotteries embraced by numerous states over the US.
It could also dismantle the new gambling that is online created in 2013 by Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware, while stifling the ambitions of others, like Pennsylvania and Ca, to follow suit.
It’s True Because it Rhymes
Its, for the part that is large a profoundly unpopular piece of legislation on Capitol Hill due to an agenda that seeks to stymie states’ tenth Amendment rights, and for the underlying whiff of crony capitalism.
Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is known to possess concocted, and financially backed the bill so as to protect his very own casino that is land-based interests.
Cash talks, however, and RAWA will receive its House hearing that is second of year next week.
No list of speakers has yet been released, but if the first hearing is anything to go by, it’s more likely to be a partisan crowd.
Additionally it is likely to contain repeated references to ‘terrorism’ and ‘money laundering,’ since well as specious discussions about ‘corrupting our youngsters,’ while studiously ignoring the undeniable fact that that is just what happens when online gambling is not strictly regulated.
It’s really likely to incorporate some type or type of ‘rhyming rhetoric,’ so beloved associated with the movement, such as ‘click your mouse, lose your house’ or ‘drop your phone, lose your house.’
Between your Cracks
Features from first hearing included Chaffetz arguing that RAWA ‘is a situation’s rights bill,’ despite all evidence to your contrary, and John Kindt, a professor at the University of Illinois Law class, quoting from the 1999 study having said that ‘online gambling cannot be regulated,’ which is similar to rock Age Man criticizing Bronze Age Man’s smelting techniques.
Kindt also declared gambling that is online be ‘the break cocaine of gambling,’ within seconds of using the stand, which is odd, because he recently additionally declared land-based slots to be the ‘crack cocaine of gambling,’ (a view, incidentally, that Sheldon doesn’t hold).
Seriously, John. It must be one or one other. It can’t be both. Hopefully this hearing will once settle the matter as well as for all.
Our point right here, though flippantly made, is that, to RAWA’s supporters, rhetoric reigns over fact. So, we will make you with the opinion of the only person at the last hearing that has worked closely and independently with the web gambling industry in america, Parry Aftab, executive director of cyber safety advice team WiredSafety. She was sneered down by many of those present.
‘we agree there are lots of issues,’ she said. ‘There are terrorists whom are utilizing online gambling and there is money laundering going on, and there’s malicious code, but that is not happening in New Jersey, Delaware or Nevada. It is happening presently with lots of the offshore gambling sites that are not covered by our laws.’
Australia In-play Betting War Escalates as Politicians and Sports Bodies Join the Fray
Australian Senator Nick Xenophon, who accused the country’s sporting bodies of ‘lobbying for the gambling industry’ in a ‘naked grab for cash.’ (Image: smh.com.au)
Aussie senator Nick Xenophon has attacked a push by the nation’s major bodies that are sporting end a ban on in-play sports gambling.
The senator condemned the move as a ‘naked grab for cash’ on behalf of the sports leagues, many of whom have signed lucrative sponsorship deals with major gambling firms headquartered overseas, and accused them of ‘lobbying for the betting industry in an official statement.
‘ This greedy move is all about boosting the bottom lines of the expert sports bodies therefore the sports betting companies with that they have licensing agreements,’ complained Xenophon, whom added that the ‘unacceptable consequence of this move could be more gambling addiction in Australia.’
Australia’s 2001 Interactive Gambling Act, drawn up before the rise of in-play sports betting, stipulates that wagers on live matches that have already started is put with bookmakers over the telephone but not online.
Gambling companies claim that the legislation has didn’t keep speed with modern technology and should be changed.
Meanwhile, UK operator William Hill has skirted this law through its Click to Call betting app, which utilizes voice recognition technology that allows bettors to confirm their wagers using a simple sound command.
The function launched in and was quickly followed into the market by copycat apps from other operators april. Obviously, this has enraged Xenophon who would like to close the appropriate loophole.
Final month, after a referral by the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the Australian Federal Police told William Hill that it could not be launching an investigation into the legality of the app that is controversial.
William Hill seized in this as a reaffirmation of the legality of its practices, calling it ‘a great outcome for Australian punters that will no much longer be forced to bet in-play via illegal offshore bookmakers which pose a threat that is huge both consumer protection and the integrity of Australian sport.’
Just to confuse issues, not totally all sporting bodies are siding with the bookmakers. Clubs Australia, the organization that represents Australia’s 6,500 licensed activities and social clubs, said that this week that it was against online recreations expansion that is betting.
‘In Clubs Australia’s view, Australia’s licensed online wagering operators have used the pretense of competition with illegal offshore wagering providers to extract a variety of regulatory concessions from governments with regards to taxation and harm minimization,’ said the corporation in an official statement.
‘Any suggestion that further regulatory concessions, such as live betting that is in-play are warranted due to competitive pressures from illegal overseas wagering operators should be dismissed.’
Xenophon has also found an unlikely ally in Australia’s homegrown that is biggest betting company Tabcorp, which argues that expanding online in-play betting would harm the racing industry.